Pages

Saturday, February 27, 2010

Waiting on the World to Change

I've often wondered why the current generation seems so complacent when faced with social issues. Why is there no marching in the streets? Why do we not hear more outrage over injustices in today's world? In the 60's so many young people were emboldened and were not afraid to voice their displeasure with the status quo and with the direction that our government was taking the country. College students were vocally opposed the Viet Nam war and they fought against the injustice of segregation. The music of the time even carried the message of outrage and the push for change. Songs like Bob Dylan's Blowing in the Wind, John Lennon's Give Peace a Chance, the Youngblood's Get Together, or Buffalo Springfield's For What It's Worth all mirrored the times and helped to focus the angst of the country in a direction of change.

Today's college student seems more interested in how he will make his fortune after college and he doesn't see the injustice of the world around him. Indeed, young people often have limited knowledge of the world around them. And when they do see injustice, many think there is nothing they can do to make a change. What is different in today's culture when compared to that of the 60's? Perhaps rather than being a mirror of the times, the music of the 60's was actually a conduit for change. People heard the music and took it to heart. They actually listened to the words and believed that they could effect change. And they did. Today, instead of protest songs to push us to change, we have songs that tell us to sit back and wait. . . . wait for the world to change.



Waiting On The World To Change
lyrics by John Mayer

Me and all my friends
We're all misunderstood
They say we stand for nothing and
Theres' no way we ever could

Now we see everything that's going wrong
With the world and those who lead it
We just feel like we don't have the means
To rise above and beat it

So we keep waiting
Waiting on the world to change
We keep on waiting
Waiting on the world to change

Sunday, February 21, 2010

Health Insurance Reform, Not Health Care Reform

There are lots of things in the Health Insurance Reform bill that Republicans and Democrats disagree on. Many Americans are dismayed just by the size of the bill itself. The enormity of the bill almost ensures that many have no idea what is really in it. Because the Democrats began this journey into fixing a broken Health Insurance system, they have a responsibility to let the American public know what is in the bill. One of the ironies of this bill is that while lots of people are against the bill as a whole, if they are asked questions about individual aspects of the bill, they are for them. That's an issue of education - of not knowing what is in the bill itself.

Most think that excluding a person from health insurance coverage due to a pre-existing condition is wrong. The current bill would correct that and prevent health insurance companies from discriminating because of pre-existing conditions. Health insurance portability is another hot button. Why can't I buy health insurance from a company in Nevada if what they offer fits my need better than the insurance offered in my own state? That's another issue that would be corrected. These are just two examples of items that on their own merit, most Americans can agree on, but when lumped into a huge all-encompassing bill, there is less agreement.

I do have to say, though, that as a liberal I am troubled by the general lack of support for a public option. I know that conservatives generally oppose any expansion of government, but if the insurance premiums deducted from paychecks start going to a government run public health care system instead of to a corporate, profit-driven insurance company, why should the average American care? The change would make it possible for every person in the country to have access to medical care. I find this possibility exciting. It's important to me that people be able to see a doctor when they need to and have access to preventative medical care which would help lower medical costs for the poor. This is much more important to me that the continuation of our current system that serves mostly to grow the coffers of public health insurance companies.

From my viewpoint, changing our current health insurance system would have no effect on the health care system. It would change who has access to health care, but not on the quality of health care itself. Our leaders need to find a way to get this message out so that the average person can understand. If an informed electorate is still opposed to the changes, then so be it. But I can't accept uninformed dissent.